FOOTNOTES PAGE TWO AUGUST 2013

8-1-13:"up date"(sc)(b.s.)(1)Connecting the Dots(sc), Culture War (2)(a), Way, Too Point Oh?(sc), Noble, No Bell, Nobel(sc), Congress- - to boldly go..., Everything is on the Table!.

8-5-13:  (b.s.) a.Pun it?, b.Trilemmas and Cultural Calculus, c.Enough Smirking!, d.Dark Matter, Anti-Matter, e. Careful Consideration , f. , g. , h. Con Fluence... , i.Knot Even , j., k.Carpe Diem!, l.Certain Sources..., m. , N .by Stiob?!?, o., P.Middle C? , Q. / [T-Row Price?]

8-9-13 (37) "dealing with" (MSNBC "All IN" & Thomas Roberts) (P.S. re:Bromance)

8-20-13 Boatload of FP needed.  4. a C Sick? , b , c , d , e , f , G , h , i Square This!  j , k , 5. a, b, c by Stiob?!? - 6. a, b() Nailed It! T-point Oh! , c CU T-party, d , e , f, g , h Square This! , ... q Tea Party Down Grade

8-21-13 Miranda Lefts? 1. a. b. c. d.  /   2.  A. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j.
8-22-13: FC /  changey thing to reads.
8-26-13 Lemon Ship may be the best name for the dynamic metaphor as I sort out how it has evolved.  Does it stem from partisan ship?  But it does refer to concentrates and dilutions.
8-27-13 Knot so Out of the Blue? 
8-28-13: A Black and White Chat, that is the ticket.(FP3)

FOOTNOTE JUNE 2013 PAGE TWO

6-5-13: too b.s. really? (1/11, 2 /11, 3 /11, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 /11, 11 /11)
Gemini : Two Points / 18, Para-model, Brackets and the Debt Clock, Commander-in-Chief Obama, 5/ , 6, Two Wrongs Make a Right?,  Un-Social Darwinism., 9 /, 10 of / , 11 /, 12 / , 13/From GOP to NOP, 14 /, N-oddly Enough... , 16 / , "OFF A CLIFF", 18 / 18.
Cricket:,   Clinton(Bill) is full of B.S. of 9, 2/9,  The Real B. S. of the F. C. /9, Rubric's Peek/9,  Now the Un-Voodoo Math/9, The History of B.S./9, CAD (2 out of 3 be bad)/9, 8  /, Straw Elephant /9 .
Jiminy Buffet?

6-24-13 hmmm? Under(sc) not to pun on UW or my academics. But under the (b.s. ) may be the balanced solution. But embedded here on the NOW(correction AM), is that Russia may currently hold Snowden.  Another Irony?  That China and Russia not keep Snowden.

6-25-13 More in eff able parsing (Nailed it[!], Index 9-21-11, And Bailout...) (fn3)

Who Let the Dogs Out?

Original reaction: Not to Second Guess.

This idea coalesced from a Melissa Harris-Perry(*) panel and a Jared Bernstein reaction.
What irritated me was the piling on upon Mitt Romney. The second guessing was how Jared Bernstein discusses the context he was taken out of. As the panel on MH-P continued after her weigh-in on words via Barack Obama the segment on Word Police had nothing to do with my change, but everything to do with it; change and context and victim hoods. Not to mention "quote(s) from Nerdlandia" creeping into the X-change. (The hazzards of live blogging.***) I had no clue in the "footnote" controversy.** Am I falling for the spin, that Raw Money is a victim? Or do I forget my own theory of Share 'n Angle? Not too mention differences of intents[!]
* to be updated
** to be related later[!]
*** the alternative would be more awkward[!]

7-9-12 A Hunch Revisited as Obama prepares* to speak on extending part of Bush tax cuts.
[Segue/break: the "Dogs" above are "aTax dogs"; my subtle skirt of the issue.]

Regarding the president's speech, here are my rough notes:  Jobs.. core mission... rebuilding economy...stalemate...choice two views.  Top down- wrong...typical middle class tax cuts $3600... repeat $3600 Obama midle class tax cuts... for sake of misinformation.  We tried, slowest job growth, falling income, rising deficits... we can't afford more.  [me: we 1/2 tried more or other way].  People are with him, cut small business taxes 18 times, for 97% of them.  We should agree to do what we agree on!  [poor 1%, 2% 3%]  One year extention for under $250K then we can debate the rest and act or wait till after the election.  You are the ones driving the economy.  Learn lessons of the past, build foundation for the future.

* speech here[Note that links for "A Hunch Revisited" were contemporary, not later insertions. Referencing democracy and choices of direction.]

[Andrea Mitchell follow-up here: "fiscal cliff"?** and tug of misinfo!  Deficit distraction or key?]

[Bingo was his dog!  NewsNation "big tent" not to mention simple math from idiots.  I'm sorry, but math is where the numbers lie.  It is math warfare.  But I digress. Well,* not exactly ! ** And pardon my pun but Swiss Romney Knife?]

** bit of a cycle/anachronism here*** regarding insertion of links & today's asterisks.(I may not have the right fiscal cliff clip but neither does the math add up for AM or RNC. Re:Bingo and math of the dog carrier or station waggin')

*** (rather here **) HW B? (SK re/v SE: 5:25 HW Harvy Weinstein)

[OW to Act?]
[Bingo too point OH! (see poor 1%, 2%, 3%: LR RL)]
(Anachronistically where does MB fit in here ? i.e. I can' remember where Luke Russert was nailed down.  But I think it was Martin Bashir who was asking about the 1, 2 or 3% and the previous sequence w/links does hit the nail on the understanding or aTAX jobs.)
[Hardball: David Corn to Smerconish "Sin of making sense". Then Bob's your uncle. It certainly rots at the head. MM Marshalling Message ?]

The History of B.S.

[Herstory and Blog Searches* aside.]
[Originally Drafted May 26, 2012]
There is a joke about what the oldest profession is, but I won’t go there.  It is more or less about procreation. The B. S. I am talking about is the flip-flop of Simpson-Bowles.[1] Yes, I believe that was its name before it hit the road.  It was supposed to be a bi-partisan committee on the debt, but could not come up with any consensus on how it should be addressed, so its full report was submitted more like a Supreme Court decision that was tied. 

Recently it seems that its name was changed, to Bowles-Simpson.[2]  Was there some reason for that?  Could it be to honor the real oldest profession?  And I don’t mean the Barter System.  If this is too nuanced, maybe it is the joke, to be less about creation, more about pro$e.  Either way this is a very economic and political history. 

[More Bio-Product.]***
Speaking of PEG’d...(Private Equity Government)[3] or nailed it, Coffee Table This! [4-7] Now that is creationism.

[Now I realize that some boots may be needed for the above, but I was trying to be economic. But the point is that it is always political and it has not been bi-partisan except on the Democratic side.  Pun on BP aside.** The irony is that it is about walking a plank.  Both want a rising tide, but the Republicans want the people to walk the plank, while politicians take one to the other party boat. Unfortunately this may need deeper boots or Mitt-Flops for the economics, let alone politics.   The B.S. may be in this writing, but it is in the links and balanced solutions as well.]

*literally I will present this without links(see footnotes later)
** bi-partisan (now that is slick)
*** oops:  sorry for anachronisms

Tin Foil Herman

[11-30-11]It's official, unless it's not.

I guess I am not "some people". I wanted a business man to run, for the sake of the nation, for the sake of the debate. For the sake of settling* what the heck market forces have to do with running a government.

* Cain references** in order:
Temporal
No Teddy
Nailed it! T-point Oh!
Never the Twain
From GOP to NOP
Bite of the Big Apple?
Courting Jesters
Apples and Oranges?
Para-Model
Cain Un-Able
Two Points
Sat Ire[!]

** Not the same Cain, or "machine"
[I might not have all the facts, but that doesn't leave Cain*** out.]

[More to sort. Witch Cain first and why did he cross the road?]
*** The "Cain" and "facts" links apparently are interchangable.(that is Jon Stewart and a YouTube)

[Sort: Search Cain is good. NOT!]
[Sorting Cheese Heads]
[Look up
attack strength.]
[Original Break on Halloween?]
Cain is an art project?
Buffet v. Trump
Cain un-Able
Ron Paul Scariest
[Meanwhile: Papa mmmm MOW OW! Michigan is still coming along, but the Bill is the Word in Ohio and Wisconsin.
Takin' out the Trash Men.]
[Rachel Maddow: A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I]
[Geez Heads Unite!Ed(!)]

Citizens United?

Nailed It! T-point Oh!

Tangent or Tetrahedron:

Not T-Rx or Too point Oh, but my segue from Jon Stewart and the T-Party to the Peas** Party, or the adult in the White House, also is symbolized in the 3* part response that is just the beginning of the Iron Chef.

*by 3, I mean, the joint session, the follow up and the long term, as represented in presentations of the Obama plan
** or Broccoli[!]

[Another T: Tangent or Tax issue see ** there ]
[BTW: It's MAD, I mean "math", but it is this simple. From T-boned to L-boned(an accidental vehicle metaphor) the Lincoln Labor / Capital reference is pertinent in a "fair and balanced" tax structure -- i.e. treat capital gains as income.]

[Not to make light of food or metaphors, but there may be something to the Cain and able of 9-9-9. The number may not be important or that it is the flip-flop of 6-6-6. but that there is nothing wrong with a flat tax, if there are flat, and sufficient but limited deductions and exemptions, as well as a sufficient safety net. Note no mention of capital gains which I read as considered income.]

Nailed it[!]

Jon Stewart roasts Wolf Blitzer's Network.
CAUTION: Cable News Network R. rated [?]

Or mabye Un-Rated is the proper rating for Comedy Central. As I was lost in pun, I transposed the networks. I had to Wiki CNN to sort its acronym. Is it still C for cable, or conservative?

Speaking of mixed messages or ratings, the T-party could have a whole new spin. Now I may have transposed my spin. Don't ask how that works. (except noting links: but that is another Tangent)

[BTW: if anyone can help me flip-flop a character[?], till that time [!] must suffice for sarcasm punctuation. BINGO! Not yet.]

[Speaking of nailing it. The president right now*, is probably eliciting some expletives. And I don't mean Geez U.S. (My apologies for the rhetorical/satirical escalation: it's a culture war**!)]

* inserted later
** now then regarding CW: also "class warfare card" almost simultaneously but... in regards to "Federal Income taxes" or "nothing", the rich are paying exactly the same as the poor on their first few dollars, as I am fairly certain that the rich are allowed the same deductions and exemptions in determining tax brackets. If they are not then that is a matter that could be adjusted.

Here's the WOW!

Bane(or) Change.
First we finally have the Republican plan,
then it is surprisingly still too early.
But the lack of wow may be the plan.*

Navigation instructions:
[Expand Comments] @Alice and wow
as well as hit "Ctrl F"
for inserts, and "insurgency".

*I don't know if I am really saying anything here, but the word oxymoron comes to mind, yet sometimes even they are justified (oximorons, that is) as reality is a paradox, and we are fighting over just what is certifiable. And some are just fighting to change the subject. By George I think I nailed it. Who knows better than a pair o'docs? Ask for another subject or more patients.

[Update: Early'r Word! Buck up! Isn't that Trickle-Down Economics gave us? Bottoms Up!
[And in Contrast? Yet to be inserted.(Scratch Read)]

Obama is Obama!

Not an FDR, nor a Truman,
and most definely* not a Bush,
burning or not, but a man of faith.
Faith in our Founding Fathers,
and team leaders not just cheer leaders.

[Bold is speech link, like it or not.]
* definitely also

[6-16-10: Ironically I think I nailed it: Obama stayed his course. He can't exactly "Go Bush on us", but he intends to get it done, with our help.]

From Pillar to Post?

Is truth really relative?
Is evil black and white or so obvious even, purely black?
Just a few questions to ponder
and wonder who would answer and/or who would even question.
The Frame?
Let's nail it down.
Does the end justify the means? Bush says no, but does otherwise.

The actual post here is possibly just as obtuse, before I nailed it.

Having not seen the new legislation calling for timetable for the removal of our troops from Iraq, it is important to note that it is only a bipartisan message from Congress. A timetable is a signal to the administration and the world the intentions of some in congress. It is the beginning of a true conversation that will require looking at our goals and methods including those past or we will continue to use them. Much could be said by running with this rhetoric but we must not run from getting more definition of our dilemma. But it may not mean much if war or having it his way is the way that Bush uses to let the world know he means what he says. And where knowing what he means is the most important area where preemption would have been wise and where knowing what other actions were preemptive.